Prediction of Paul Annacone vs Glenn Layendecker Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Annacone vs G. Layendecker

Paul Annacone

USA

2

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Glenn Layendecker

USA

2

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Annacone 2 - 2 Layendecker

They have played 9 sets in total, with Paul Annacone winning 5 and Glenn Layendecker winning 4. The last match between Paul Annacone and Glenn Layendecker was at the Vienna, 16-10-1989, Round: QF, Surface: Carpet, with Paul Annacone getting the victory 6-3 7-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Annacone	2
Layendecker	2

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(QF) Vienna(10-16-89)

Stats

Paul Annacone

Glenn Layendecker

(R3) Stratton Mountain(07-31-89)

Stats

Glenn Layendecker

Paul Annacone

(QF) Newport(07-10-89)

Stats

Glenn Layendecker

Paul Annacone

P. Annacone vs G. Layendecker H2H Profile

P. Annacone	Stats	G. Layendecker
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
55.29% (162-131)	Career Total W/L	46.22% (104-121)
0	Grass	1
1	Hard	1
1	Indoor	0
3	Titles	2
2	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Annacone vs G. Layendecker Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul Annacone has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Glenn Layendecker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul Annacone, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Glenn Layendecker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Paul Annacone has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Glenn Layendecker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Paul Annacone has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Glenn Layendecker winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Paul Annacone has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 39/24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Glenn Layendecker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 4/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 23% (W/L 3/10).
Player level: In the last year, Paul Annacone has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Glenn Layendecker has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Paul Annacone winning 2 times and Glenn Layendecker being victorious 2 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Paul Annacone winning 5 and Glenn Layendecker winning 4.
The last match between Paul Annacone and Glenn Layendecker was at the Vienna, 16-10-1989, Round: QF, Surface: Carpet, with Paul Annacone getting the victory 6-3 7-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul Annacone has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Glenn Layendecker has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul Annacone has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Glenn Layendecker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul Annacone has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Glenn Layendecker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Paul Annacone vs Glenn Layendecker Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Annacone vs G. Layendecker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Annacone	Stats	G. Layendecker
2	H2H Matches Won	2
5	Sets Won	4
50	Games Won	45
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (2/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (2/4)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
67% (2/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
33% (1/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	33% (1/3)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Annacone Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Beijing - 18-10-1993
R1 Shuzo MatsuokaS. Matsuoka	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Long Island - 24-08-1992
R1 Carsten ArriensC. Arriens	L	6-2 2-6 6-2	Stats
Manchester - 15-06-1992
R1 Andrei CherkasovA. Cherkasov	W	7-6(4) 6-7(2) 7-6(7)	Stats
R2 Arne ThomsA. Thoms	L	1-6 7-5 6-3	Stats
Philadelphia - 17-02-1992
R1 Jeff TarangoJ. Tarango	L	6-7(4) 6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

G. Layendecker Recent Matches Played

Empty Result

P. Annacone vs G. Layendecker Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Annacone	Stats	G. Layendecker
55.29% (162/131)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
53.34% (415/363)	Sets Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
51.17% (3968/3787)	Games Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
49.19% (61/63)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
46.67% (7/8)	Clay Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
60.44% (55/36)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
61.90% (39/24)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
254.37	Average Opponent Rank	0
54.17% (26/22)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
36.84% (7/12)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
56.95% (127/96)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
66.67% (2/1)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
55% (126/230)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
54% (32/59)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
71% (5/7)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
51% (55/107)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/0)
81% (155/125)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
19% (155/30)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
25% (135/34)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)